61st Lesson

Ukraine: an American prostitute ... and monster. Part 2.

'Biolab' (Biological Laboratory). Do you ever wonder what goes on these places? America is doing some of it's 'dirty work' in Ukraine.

"The US is using Ukraine to manufacture components for biological weapons," ... "has come to this conclusion after interviewing multiple eyewitnesses and going over some 2,000 pages of documentation found in Kherson Region and the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics." - RT.com, 11th April, 2023.

Furthermore: "The analysis of the obtained documents allowed us to clearly identify the people involved in the military biological activities in Ukraine, including representatives of the US Department of Defense and American companies with ties to it," ... "... the US had spent more than $224 million on biological programs in Ukraine since 2005. The investigator added that foreign aid was used to equip and upgrade around 30 research centers governed by Ukraine’s defense, health and agricultural ministries." - RT.com, 3rd May, 2022.

Extra fuel was added to the fire when the United Nations Security Council voted against a probe into these biolabs in November, 2022. Quote: "The UN Security Council has rejected Russia’s call for an international investigation into claims that the US used laboratories in Ukraine to develop biological weapons. While China backed Russia’s proposal, the US, Britain, and France voted against it, and the ten rotating council members abstained."

So why did the Americans, and their obedient and faithful 'poodles', the UK ("Britain") and France vote against a probe? What are they trying to prevent being exposed?

Since the 'Maidan Revolution' of 2014, America has been presented with an opportunity to indulge in many abuses in Ukraine. The country was opened up to anyone with a vested interest in exploiting it for either military or commercial purposes. The biolab scandal is but one of these abuses.

The fact remains that biolabs remain (at least) one of the largest threats to Russia. They have every right to be concerned, and even more so that an investigation into activity at these biolabs has been blocked at the United Nations Security Council.

It's not just the danger of biological warfare though. With the Russians having to push further into Ukraine to protect their own country, and land acquired in Ukraine, it will become an increasing risk for all concerned if one or more of these biolabs gets hit by any projectiles. What will be released into the atmosphere if this does happen? Because these biolabs are cloaked in secrecy, nobody can tell what horrors will await those who could be exposed to pathogens released after such an incident.

Ukrainian biolabs.

The very unholy trinity of American Senators John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Amy Klobuchar. They are pictured with the former Ukrainian President Poroshenko on their Dec 2016 visit to his country.

Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel: "the Minsk agreement served to buy time to rearm Ukraine. The 2014 Minsk agreement was an attempt to give Ukraine time", Merkel told the weekly Die Zeit. "It also used this time to become stronger, as you can see today." ... "It was clear to all of us that this was a frozen conflict, that the problem had not been solved, but that is precisely what gave Ukraine valuable time," - Betrayal of the Minsk Accords

62nd Lesson

Ukraine: an American prostitute ... and monster. Part 3.

None of what is happening now would been possible without the creation of a monster. In the preceding lesson I briefly mentioned the 'Maidan Revolution'. It has also been referred to as the 'Revolution of Dignity'. However, it was anything but dignified. In fact, one could reasonably argue this event was planned well before it occurred, and to serve the purposes not of 'liberation', but to encroach upon land bordering Russia. But let's consider the events of 2014, and those briefly leading up to the usurping of a pro-Russian, but legitimate government.

Firstly, how do you define a country's borders? How far back in history do you go to decide where they should be drawn? Ukraine is a country that had remained undefined for a very long time. In fact ... "A fully independent Ukraine emerged only late in the 20th century, after long periods of successive domination ..."_[1],[2]

Not demeaning the nation itself, but regardless of it's history, Ukraine is now a fully independent culture. You can argue the toss on it's ethnic makeup, but a very large part of it identifies as Ukrainian. But herein begins the sinister plot by outside forces to exploit it's newfound freedom.

In 2014, Ukraine was no more than a young child compared to other established nations around the world. As a consequence, it is naive in it's ability to recognise those who are trying to influence it's development. You could say it is both exposed to, and a victim of 'child abuse'. Such a child will mature in a world where it is in danger of remaining so if it allows other nations to continue to use it without any reproach.

But that 'revolution' in 2014. It was supposed to be the defining moment when the child was supposed to enter the big bad world as an adult. It has had to grow up quickly as a consequence. But while it has been left to some degree to it's own destiny, the child's 'guardians' who have maintained their otherwise than benign influence, have not had the child's best interests at heart. This is due to America's desire to try and mould Ukraine into something that they consider acceptable to their own ideals. but the issue here is that these ideals are not always what they appear to be. Pre-revolution visits from some dubious American characters was a prelude to their ambitions - ones which were anything but completely honest. America saw an opportunity to exert it's covert dominance over this fledgling nation.

63rd Lesson

Doctors: what do they know? Well, likely a lot more than you do, but it isn't always what is best for you. So why can they be so narrow minded at times?

Members of the medical profession work in different jobs, at different grades and with varying experience. But sadly, the text books they have to learn from, and the advice given to them by those who supposed to guide them, is often lacking in one key area. You can have great experience and respected qualifications all gained at the highest level, but initiative? My own personal experience is that I have often encountered these professionals and found them floundering when they are taken out of their 'comfort zone'. Some are so proud that they feel insulted if someone who is not on their level suggests something they are not familiar with. This happened to me some years ago when I suffered from 6th (Cranial) Nerve Palsy.

I had to suffer for weeks because I could just not get into a hospital bed, and frequently and unceremoniously turfed out of Accident & Emergency departments because they would not take my condition at face value. There were times my illness was so bad, I actually thought death was better than the continuous and debilitating side effects I had to endure. It was horrible. Even one of my own doctors from my local surgery became frustrated at not being able to get me a hospital bed, and he was a wonderful doctor at that. A real professional with compassion and understanding, and yet even he was powerless to get the hospital bed I so desperately needed.

During the weeks of suffering, I, or my wife, had called paramedics a total of 23 times to help me. On 6 occasions I could still not get into a hospital as a full admission. Eventually, and due mainly to my own endeavours, I got the bed I needed. The ridiculous thing was I was not quite as ill as in the earliest weeks of my illness, but still suffering to a degree.

I had various tests performed upon my body. The consultants who saw me in hospital kept trying to convince me they may know the cause of my illness, but to no avail. Nothing they tried could find the cause of this affliction. This was even after two stays in hospital, both of which became intolerable for various reasons. On both occasions, I had to discharge myself as nothing was being achieved.

It was only when I was well enough to stay in front of my laptop computer that I could do some research on my condition. I think it took me a mere 2 hours to discover the cause of my illness. When I eventually finished my medical supervision, I got to see another consultant for a final check-up. I told him that my condition was caused by something called 'Computer Vision Syndrome'. It is openly chronicled on the internet, but the consultant said he had never heard of it. What? The person who was supposed to be the most qualified person to help me and he was totally unaware of this condition? I am sorry to say this is true.

So what value our medical experts when they can think no further than the literature they have so carefully studied? Why can't they be more open minded, and not so proud that if they are told of something crucial by someone who is generally considered to be only a lay person, that it is not an insult to their alleged intelligence?

I also experienced this type of mentality when the Covid 'scamdemic' struck. The ignorance I saw on display was sometimes breathtaking. I was used to seeing ordinary people being easily brainwashed by the endless stream of deceitful propaganda, but members of the medical profession? I saw them with face visors and flimsy, unsuitable masks strapped across their face - because they were told they had to wear something like this. These so-called safeguards were to protect the wearer from the Covid virus. And there were some just using face masks which are not even designed to protect you from any type of virus (see the image below).

So when someone tells you that you have to wear one of these masks to protect others from any virus you may have, and that they really think they are protected as well by using one, then it beggars the question; do these medical professionals ever really know what they are taking about? Trust me when I tell you never to put your complete faith in whoever is conducting your health care. If this was not bad enough, I have also gained years of experience dealing with some 'professionals' who are either downright stupid, or crooked. But that is another can of worms I am not yet ready to open.

64th Lesson

An American expression goes like this: "Don't get mad, get even". Sound advice when you feel angry.

Getting angry is a natural reaction to something which you experience when you suffer some kind of injustice. It's worse when the suffering you have to put up with is either unfair, or just completely unnecessary. But letting anger control your reactions is something to be wary of.

The most outrageous will cause you to feel that you want to react instantly. You may well get into situations like this at some point in your life, and it is sometimes of your own making - to a degree. Placing your trust in someone, which is what we have to do at times, and seeing that trust abused or not treated with the respect it demands, can raise your blood pressure through the roof. But reacting immediately and aggressively can make your situation much worse. Take a 'time out' and stop to consider the most effective and best way to respond. This will save you from having any regrets following an outburst of uncontrolled emotion.

"When angry count to ten before you speak. If very angry, count to one hundred." - Thomas Jefferson, President of the United States from 1801 to 1809.

Of course 'getting even' is not always the solution to your predicament. Sometimes, it is just the simple fact that whatever is done to you may not have been out of malice, or any form of disrespect. It may just have been the moral failure of someone you should have known better never to trust or rely upon. Not easy when it is a stranger that enrages you though, but that should make you even more cautious as to who you feel obliged to trust. The time to feel when there should be a response of some severity, just to make you feel that justice really does need to be seen to be done, is when you need to be calm, cool and collected.

For example, has someone swindled you, especially someone you thought was a trusted source, or maybe even someone you thought was a friend? The worst form of insult and betrayal comes from those we expected much better of. In this respect, revenge is not foremost upon your mind. The best thing to do is, if you feel it is justified, to break that bond. Let whoever committed such an injustice against you have time to reflect upon their own guilt. Let them come to you at some later point with a sincere apology - not that you should ever really trust them again.

As for those who sinned against you with evil intentions, then count to ten, or one hundred. Retribution, if appropriate, may not be immediately forthcoming. Bide your time and wait for the right moment to settle a score. OK, it may be against your good nature to seek some degree of justice, but never feel guilty about it. The person at the receiving end of your reaction may actually benefit from some degree of suffering. Sometimes some people really need that proverbial 'slap across the face', if only to make them aware of what they have done, and the consequences of doing it to someone else.

The only caveat I would add to these words of advice is that we are sometimes reminded what is said in the Bible. This is "to err is human, to forgive is divine". As I have already said, if someone is genuinely regretful of what they have done to you, then this is the best way to respond. But if the person who has 'erred' is steeped in low morals, then forgiveness will be a wasted exercise. It will only tell the person who has exploited you that they feel no danger of retribution and will continue to exploit you for as long as they can. Try to recognise people like this as quickly as possible and forget about forgiveness until the other person is sufficiently punished. After that, wash your hands of the entire experience and walk away. If you are both wise, you will both have learned a valuable lesson.

"Revenge is a dish best served cold," - French author Eugène Sue and his novel, "Memoirs of Matilda". The English translation of the work by D. G. Osbourne, published in 1846, has the phrase appear as follows: "And then revenge is very good eaten cold, as the vulgar say." - Source

NB. Not wishing to sound flippant, but be careful that such a 'dish' does not give you indigestion - especially if you try to consume it too quickly.

65th Lesson

Where would you like your new home to be built? A new development surrounded by greenery? Or do you want to be close to a busy town or city - just for convenience?

There will always be a demand for new housing, and in some cases, it also means renovating older properties to meet this need. However, some new developments are not always welcomed, and this is especially true of the greenest areas of the country. 'NIMBYs' (Not In My Back Yard) do not always like people invading what they wish to preserve. This is true of the countryside where people appreciate living in small and friendly communities. Learning that a large sprawl of new housing is going to appear in your idyllic setting, and just yards away from your own front door, can horrify even the most amiable people. For them, it is tantamount to having squatters coming to live in your own home.

Then there is the worry about the social impact of complete strangers not accustomed to living in the countryside, bringing their 'city-orientated' and 'alien attitudes' to your relatively calm and peaceful environment. And what happens after some new homes are built? Maybe an expansion and yet more housing. Where will it end?

Then there is the appearance of shops and supermarkets, busy roads, etc. Suddenly, the thought of your own little paradise is consumed by this avaricious, giant monster that is growing out of control and threatening to consume your tranquillity. 'Paradise lost', you could say. But isn't everyone entitled to live in a more natural and calmer environment, and away from the hustle and bustle of a crowded suburban population?

Next we come to 'brownfield' sites. These can bring unwelcome dangers. Is your new modern and trendy home built on chemically polluted and former industrial land? How much surface material is removed before it is considered safe to build upon it? And are the standards high enough to truly make the soil beneath your feet safe to grow anything you may wish to later consume?

For those living in the 'fast lane', people who just want a roof above their head and use their home for convenience more so than enjoyment of it's surrounding, it will not be an issue for them.

Everything you need is at hand and no need to think about anything outside of your four walls. If that is really what you desire, so be it. But living in a tightly packed community can bring it's own challenges. Everyone expects all of their neighbours to maintain some level of order. This is certainly more true than a community in a sparsely populated village (for example). Everyone has to sleep, keep their sanity and live within certain limits. If someone frequently likes playing loud music, this can even drive you to contemplating doing something very grievous to your tormentor. Then there is keeping the surroundings of your home in order. No trash laying in badly kept areas which will attract rats. Everyone has to realise that it is in the best interests of all maintain certain standards, and not be so selfish as to antagonise all of those around them. So live like intensively farmed animals if you wish, but do not expect the peace of mind you can obtain by getting away from it all.

Another consideration is this: if you are also living on a former industrial site, are there any other dirty industries still operating around your home? Is it subject to the noise from other sources as well - such as the heavy traffic passing by on a regular basis? Convenience comes at a cost, both to your psychological and physical well-being. Expect pollution is some way, shape or form.

Chose your poison carefully. Either a pastoral landscape or an intensive lifestyle can bring it's own unique challenges. You have to accept the rough with the smooth and in different ways.

NB. If you do opt for living in the countryside, be careful of the type of farming that may be going on near to you. This in itself can bring it's own health risks and concerns.

66th Lesson

Are you really in control of your life? Are you being directed by 'back seat drivers'? Perhaps you are being constantly nagged, criticised, or feeling under pressure from someone else's behaviour.

I have already spoken about aspects of your personality in previous lessons. But this one is about control. If you find yourself in an emotionally combative relationship, then you really need to take control of your own destiny. You need to 'detoxify' your life.

The first question I put to you is this: do you know who you really are? Are you being regularly influenced by the needs and demands of others? if you really want to help others, you help yourself first.

If you are in a lasting relationship of some kind, being single-minded is not easy. You can easily be distracted from the person you were, or wanted to be when you were single and carefree. This is why some people find divorce liberating. It's not always because of ill-feeling between partners, it's just that you were never meant to be together. You are just too different to make your own lives as desirable as you wish. It's worse one one takes control of the other person's life. A dominant and a submissive person can live happily together, but when one feels oppressed then your partnership is not going to work out for you, is it?

In such a relationship where there is individual and incompatible lifestyles, any partner who is submissive is going to let themself be ground to dust if the other side of the relationship is aggressively dominant. You can never do anything right. Your choices and decisions are frequently criticized, you are made to feel inferior, to feel small and insignificant. This is not healthy, and the longer this dreadful state of affairs lasts, the worse it will become.

So, before you enter into any agreement, be it a personal or working relationship, you need to identify exactly what you want, what you are prepared to tolerate, and what is totally unacceptable. Ignore these facts at your own peril. But if both parties recognise the other person's requirements, then it can still work for them. It's simply give and take and be happy with that. Neither half of a relationship should be critical of the other half if they wish to succeed in whatever their desires may be. if you cannot mange this, forget it. It matters not what your other feelings may be for your other half, if it is doomed to fail, the it will fail. Accept that this is the way it is.

A little lesson I learned a long time ago is this; if you cannot respect yourself, do not expect others to respect you either. This emphasises the importance of knowing exactly what you are and not allowing others to trample all over you. OK, you may be somewhat 'mousy' and timid, but even mice need to roar sometimes. The timid side of your personality needs to be pushed aside and allow your deepest feelings to be demonstrated to those who too often take you for granted.

Still feeling subdued and under pressure from others? Consider this partial quote from the movie, 'Network': "All I know is that first you've got to get mad. You've got to say: I'm a human being, god-dammit! My life has value!" - Network movie

Yes, YOUR life has value. Remember this!

67th Lesson

Why does America think it has some special right to tell other countries what they can and cannot do? In Lesson 66 I spoke of 'back seat drivers'. But America is much more than this. It lays down the rules for how you should drive, and even takes control of the wheel when it choses to do so.

Some see the Americans as arrogant. In some cases, this is true. During my stays in America, I have found the larger majority of people there to be quite well-adjusted, reasonable, helpful and friendly. But it is those who are invested with power who sometimes make you think the entire country is a lunatic asylum. Well ... if you listen to some of the bellicose and arrogant remarks that are 'farted out' from the White House, you could easily come to this conclusion.

It matters not who resides in this property, be it Democrat or Republican. The messages are usually of the same nature inasmuch that those with power see themselves as gods. Make someone President, anyone, and it seems the authority invested in them goes straight to their head and they think they can do no wrong - even when they are clearly guilty of some indiscretion.

It's not just the White House either. The agencies they control sometimes echo or simulate the inane ramblings of the President. At present, in 2024, and since the last Presidential election in 2020, we have seen how the 'Deep State' has repeatedly abused it's power and victimised Donald Trump. Do not be mistaken though. I am definitely not a fan of this 'American product' as he represents some things I completely abhor. But watching how the Deep State_[1] has continually attacked him has been like watching a gang of thugs repeatedly kicking a dog while it is lying on the floor. But this is just one example of how those who have a mightier-than-thou attitude think they can operate - and without any repercussions. And if they can treat a former serving President in this way, what hope for all others whom they wish to dominate with their sick and twisted ideology?

As an example of the rabidity of the Deep State, and the government as a whole, the recent statement about Russia: "US pledges to prevent Russia from developing new energy projects" ... "Washington wants to ensure that Novatek’s Arctic LNG 2 project is “dead in the water,” the State Department has said."_[2] America threatening another country's civilian project with hostile intentions? This one really does 'take the biscuit'.

This is but one demonstration of America dictating to the rest of the world it's own rules for how other countries should conduct themselves. Sanctions against Russia due to the conflict in Ukraine is another. Unless everyone obeys America's demands on the sanctions imposed upon Russia, they too will incur Uncle Sam's wrath.

The sabotage of the Nordstream gas pipeline was also welcomed in America, and yet another indication that what America does not like, it will destroy. Not directly maybe, but America's mucky fingerprints is all over this one - either in the planning and / or execution stages.

Julian Assange_[3]. The man who helped expose American establishment crimes. But the reporter has now spent 5 years (by April, 2024) in a British prison for these revelations.

American Foreign Policy

This represents America to a tee. Regime change in other countries has often been on the menu. In fact, you can consider it as a 'House speciality'. If there is someone they wish to depose, for some political reason, they will contrive a situation where they can achieve their objective.

By hook, or by crook, the Americans will always try to 'get their man'.

References:

[1] Deep State

[2] America threatens to sabotage Russian project

[3] Julian Assange

68th Lesson

A healthy diet? Omnivore or herbivore? It all depends upon your viewpoint, but it is a lot easier today to modify your diet.

I was raised the traditional way. Meat, fish and veg, along with all the trimmings and the usual desserts. There was nothing unusual about my diet at this time. But I got older, my view of the world was changing, and I felt it was worth trying something different. the first step I took was to become Pescatarian (as before, but without the meat). This is possibly the most effective diet I had taken up when it came to losing weight.

In later years, and into my 30s, I tried a Vegetarian diet (an end to eating any and all seafood). However, this obviously meant further limitations on what I could eat. But I managed even allowing for the restrictions which were somewhat challenging. Slowly but surely though, the natural progression was towards a Vegan diet. So out went everything except the vegetables. This regime actually put a strain on my body and I could not cope for very long. Eventually, I had to abandon this practice.

Now I am very much back to 'square one' and eat an omnivorous diet (back to meat, seafood, fruit and veg). I'm not really happy with this way of life, though I do seek out Vegan alternatives when they are acceptable. Let's face it though, unless you are more carnivorous than omnivorous, meat and seafood proteins can make up only the smaller proportion of what you actually eat.

Now we are in the 21st Century, becoming Vegan is a lot easier. There are so many alternatives to (in general) meat that it is not too difficult to make the transition. That has been the big issue in the past when finding meat alternatives was virtually impossible. But now various companies are being very creative with meat alternatives.

I'm not in the UK at this point in time, but when i was I discovered a Vegan sausage that was very similar to the traditional British 'banger'. They made really good hot dogs (with fried onions and American style mustard), and were also perfectly good in meals such as sausage and mash (with onion gravy, of course!).

Sadly, the ones I purchased regularly were, for some strange reason, discontinued. Maybe it was because there was now so much competition that they just got squeezed out of the market. In a way, this could be interpreted as a good sign as it possibly means that their competitors brands are just as good, if not even better.

Of course, if you wish to move away from an omiverous diet, it does not have to be with one big leap. Introduce more Vegan (or Vegetarian) meals into your diet. Slowly, but surely, you may come to the conclusion that you do not need to eat meat and fish. But if you cannot fully transition, introduce more Vegan or Vegetarian foods into your diet as you may just feel better for it.

Whatever you decide, there has never been a better time to experiment. My only word of caution if keep a good level of protein in your diet as this is what makes your body feel more satisfied. Keep a good balance of vitamin-rich foods in your diet as well, though where they may be deficient, you can always take supplements (organically obtained, if possible). So, go on, give it a try. Nobody is going to condemn you if you cannot adapt. It's your body, and it's your choice what you put into it. But try to understand it's needs, and not always it's selfish demands.

69th Lesson

Charity: how far can it go, or stretch? Everything has limits. Some 'clarity' on charity.

In the 27th and 28th Lessons, I spoke of poverty. But can you expect established large charity organisations to give as much as you think they should? The bigger the charity, then potentially the less they can give. This is because that volunteers aside, they have to cover their costs. Some staff have to be paid, offices they operate from have to be financed, and the adverts which often rely upon emotional blackmail do not come cheap either.

I have a friend who agreed to give a regular and reasonable monthly donation to a charity. This was taken as an excuse to abuse that generosity as he kept receiving telephone calls trying to persuade him to give more and more money. It is persistent, and they gave my friend no relief from the bombardment of calls he received, possibly in the hope that if the charity would pester him enough, he would give in and make larger donations. But if he did, the calls would still keep coming. How far can we push this guy, they were thinking.

This is an appalling way to behave towards someone who just wants to help less fortunate people. Perhaps the telephone 'salespeople' were on commission?

Then there are the TV advertisements that get you started on this terrible journey. Virtually every time we turn on the TV, we are presented with sad stories that are supposed to tug at our heart strings. It's like a fishing line. You take the bait, and then you are considered to be hooked. And exactly how many charities are out there? Watching TV in the UK was something you had to be wary of. As soon as the advertisements came on, you just knew that an appeal for money was coming up - either in the first commercial break, or the next one. All one could do is mute the volume and turn away from the TV screen, occasionally glancing back and waiting for the programme you were previously watching to resume.

I'm not cold-hearted person. Here in my current location (the Philippines) I often see people trying to make some meagre income by selling either cheap products outside establishments or offering to do a good turn for a few Pesos. I always look at those who are genuinely in need of cash and I frequently give something. But charity has limits, unless, as I have said, you get hooked by someone who will try to bleed you dry. Then you are considered to be a proverbial 'Rockefeller' and loaded with cash.

My advice is this: if you wish to give something to a charity, first check them out. See what percentage of their income actually reaches the people they are supposed to be helping. I say this as you are there to help others, not just give someone a job. If you are satisfied that they are credible and worthy of your money, just make untraceable donations. This could be monthly, annually, or whatever. But make sure that none of your chosen charities get your details. Also don't forget you are not on some ego trip and giving money because it makes you feel better, you give money because it feels like the right thing to do. Recognise that fact and be content that you have helped without looking for some moral approval.

70th Lesson

"Whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad." True words indeed. We see them in practice in real life.

"An early version of the phrase 'Whom the gods would destroy'... appears in verses 620–623 of Sophocles' play Antigone." The English translation is: "Evil appears as good in the minds of those whom god leads to destruction." - Wikipedia

In the 67th Lesson, I have mentioned something called the 'Deep State'. They are very real and Donald Trump has seen how they use constant pressure to try and make him go mad. How much of a threat to this secretive movement is Trump? A clue can be gleaned from the assassination of John F Kennedy ("JFK"). Kennedy was wise to what was happening around him, and because he had the authority as President to do something about it, he became too much of a danger to those who felt threatened by him. Therefore, it was decided that he had to go.

Even after his death, JFK never received any justice. There are numerous conspiracy theories regarding his death, but the true architects of his demise were never bought to justice. All that was offered was a 'patsy' called Lee Harvey Oswald. Well that is what some people think, though the official story puts all the blame on him. The verdict was all tied up with red, white and blue ribbons and presented to the public. But nobody was allowed to open the box it was wrapped around to see exactly what lay inside of it.

Of the conspiracy theories that do prevail, the CIA is central to at least some of the. These are some of the 'gods' of the Deep State, those with the at least some power to destroy those they so desire to do so. But this will only be at the behest of more powerful figures, the greater gods, who command their minions to act upon there behalf.

So how deep is the Deep State? How deep is a bottomless pit? Of the extent of their 'godly' powers, I could ask how long is a piece of string? The more you think about it, the more disturbing these revelations could be. Does anyone have the courage to try and challenge those who have so much power over life and death? Should Trump win the Presidency in 2024, he may well find out exactly how much danger he will face if he does start to dig for the truth.

Ergo, the most sobering experience you can have in life is to experience the limitations of your human rights, and even your own powers when faced with a force so great it cannot be defeated. Any misplaced bravado can so easily be crushed, and those who ask questions about any potential victim will also feel a similar cold child go down their spine when they finally realise that they are also powerless to challenge those forces which are much greater than themselves.

The bottom line here is that it is easier to destroy someone by ensuring they suffer such outrageous ill fortune that they go mad trying to defend their reputation. This way the target gets so humiliated and defamed that most people will see that person as being genuinely mad. Truly and completely destroyed, not just by the gods, but the devices they use to help you destroy yourself.